USGA/R&A Distance Report

Sparky Oh man, that is nothing. Nevermind.

A 3-5 yard distance loss is not a big deal at all for male amateurs . Who knows by 2030 what equipment advances will come about to offset that and might even be hitting it further by then. Plus investing a little time in a proper fitting and some practice amateurs can learn to hit the centre of the club more regularly and gain distance

DonM lol, I think @scotts33 has posted about results of the softer balls being slower (ball speed), even for slower swing speeds. Looks like USGA has also jumped on board to this.

It appears that the USGA feels as if the the trend will continue with swing speed and ball speed.....and that is what this about, at least in part.

ode It appears that the USGA feels as if the the trend will continue with swing speed and ball speed.....and that is what this about, at least in part.

Its probably a reasonable expectation. Athletes will continue to get better and stronger as they always have in every sport. technology, physical conditioning, etc will all continue to advance so I see this as not so much an attempt to dial back distances as to try and slow the progression. As per my post above, in 10 years we may well be at the same distances that pros are today, even with the change in ball

Our, meaning the recreational golfers, opinion is meaningless to the USGA/R&A. We don't have a trade association/union, so to speak, voicing our opinion in one voice. We are just individuals offering comments and they don't care what we have to say. Individually we have no influence, even though without us there would literally be no golf. It's nice for a discussion but as far as having any real effect on their decisions they don't give a rat's azz what any of us think, nor do they care...It's the golf ball today, tomorrow it will the game improvement woods and irons...The only way to get them to listen to the 99% of golfers who actually keep the game rolling in the money is to stop buying what they try to sell us.

Spuzz So it's play "their" ball (at what crazy price point btw?) or play those non-spinning POS balls?

I'm sure there will be new balls for slow and average speed players. I doubt we will lose much at all with premium balls designed for 90 MPH. Just my guess from a business point of view.

ode Yeah, supposedly all of the people playing Soft Feels and such are already losing distance by doing that. I was just trying to say that if that is your ball, you're not going to lose distance under the new rules.

DonM Just my guess from a business point of view.

I am not talking about distance. I don't give a rat's ass.
I am talking about having a choice of what ball, at an affordable price, that I want to play.
IE. a urethane ball that is not a marshmallow
Is price collusion a possibility? Will they still make the balls that are currently available but just call them "illegal?"
Just curious as I will have enough balls stocked up in my closet by then that I won't give a shit.
I also have enough high lofted driver heads to not care when they fuck those up too. LOL

Spuzz when they fuck those up too. LOL

.....and they will, eventually.

For those who like to get worked up, I believe that the next characteristic to be looked at and limited will be MOI and overall MOI. Hints are out there.

I hope they roll back driver size to 350cc, I'd better get ready by stocking up on SMT Shinnecocks. Or that Root Beer head.

Sparky Or that Root Beer head.

O2.

Looks like industry leader Titleist is pushing back:
https://www.golfdigest.com/story/titleist-golf-ball-rollback-comment-usga-r-and-a

Sparky I hope they roll back driver size to 350cc, I'd better get ready by stocking up on SMT Shinnecocks. Or that Root Beer head.

Let's go hickory, persimmon and gutta perch. That will dial shit back.......

sdandrea1 Let's go hickory, persimmon

Pro Baseball mandates wooden bats……so, good idea.

Sneakylong Especially when it’s detrimental to the stated ‘good for the growth of the game.’

I can’t imagine why someone with the USGA would state that? “Good for the game” sure, I could understand that. They’ve made multiple comments about returning skills/shots to the game, but “growth”? If there’s some logic there, I’m not following it.