Stu1961 the distances added to the game over the last thirty plus years have not made me enjoy the game any more.
I would argue all of the technology gains over the last 30 years have made the game better / more enjoyable for the average golfer. It’s cumulative. Why regress?
Eguller This new ball may well stunt TW's comeback!! He was already coming up short last weekend, with irons. Driver was blasting past his partners though.
Oh wait...he'll be a Champion Tour member when it applies.
Shorter courses anyway.
Never mind.
Eguller Rory on average would lose approx. 15-26 yards.
No wonder Rory is all for this new ball.
It's going to keep him out of the trees!!
Spuzz but only after being unnecessarily punished, and punishing those who only play for fun.
But if you are a recreational player and you don't want to be punished...move up a tee box. Problem solved. Isn't that easier than adding 600 yards to every course that hosts a competition?
If maximum enjoyment is the target here, then recreational golfers should be playing the front tee boxes at all times.
But if you want to play the back tees, but now your 250 yard drive only goes 235, then yeah, you're not going to like golf. If you want to play the back tees and feel like a Pro, well, that takes more than equipment.
Another story from my local muni. #16 is a dogleg left, all hazard left. Maybe 320 on a straight line, but you must carry 260-270. The safe route right is a 220 tee shot short of trees, leaving 200 in. But you can hit a 220 yd shot over a tall tree on the corner and leave 150 in. That shot to 150 was the usual choice and made this hole very playable.
This course was built in the 50s. I never saw anyone try to go straight at the green. Then about 10-15 years ago, that changed. All of a sudden, numerous players started taking the chance. I am sure a few heroic efforts succeeded, but the vast majority failed miserably. And many of those failures went far left into a row of houses. I remember sitting there watching a couple of 20 somethings each try 5 or 6 tee shots to drive that green. 1 may have made it, but I am certain 4 or 5 hit houses.
The homeowners sued, and won. The muni course (that means our tax dollars) had to pay for repairs, AND they had to rebuild the tee box placing large tees left. Not only did that take away the straight line shot, it also took away the 3 wood over the tree. Now you either play a duck hook, or you hit the 220 shot and leave yourself 200 in. If you hit a fade, forget it.
And guess what, the owners of the 60 year old houses left and long of the green have just sued the course, saying that the changes in the tee box have significantly increased the number of balls hitting their homes.
We'll all be playing solely on simulators soon and none of this will matter.
Sneakylong I would argue all of the technology gains over the last 30 years have made the game better / more enjoyable for the average golfer.
And I would argue that it’s only made it easier … not better, … and for the occasional golfer not average. Just like bumpers in the gutters for when kids go bowling.
Sparky But if you are a recreational player and you don't want to be punished.
By forcing rec golfers to play one ball, or change to a different tee box as you say, you are punishing them. You are removing a choice of how they enjoy the game.
Why should an archaic organization force the 99 percent of it's participants to do it their way?
It's unnecessary and it's BS.
The rest of your scenario can be rectified with simple on course out of bounds (already being done at the pro level) or local rules added. Not that hard.
As far as adding yards to competition course, why would a rec golfer give a fuck about that? And who are you to tell others how they should enjoy the game and what equates to enjoyment?
It appears you think score is the only objective to fun. It's not everyone's view.
Stu1961 I’m not going to research the history of hockey pucks. If you want to meet in the middle with tennis as a comparison, I’m game.
You don't need to. They have been the same size and weight forever.
The sticks are not wood anymore. The athletes are not small anymore. The ice they play on is smoother and faster. Average shots are faster. Sound familiar?
No puck "roll back" will happen.
I know jack shit about tennis equipment but, as a guess, I would say there are less aces on a clay court than a hard court, in comparison to how fairways are cut.
Oh man, that is nothing. Nevermind.
What, and kill a chance for everyone to crab?
The R&A press release today says that about 30% of current balls already meet the new standards. Every person here playing Soft Feel, Supersoft, Pinnacle Soft, etc. can rest easy because you won’t lose a millimeter.
Leave the ball alone and let them go LOW!
I'm still a bit put off, and feeling a bit queasy, of this discussion of the velocity of my balls.
I just feel they are somehow being squeezed by complete strangers.
Anyone who thinks the USGA and R&A has any credibility just needs to look back several years. Mike Davis was on the Golf Channel saying they had no intention to do anything regarding long putters. That didn’t last long.
Shortly after Keegan Bradley, Webb Simpson, Ernie Els and Adam Scott won Majors using long putters they quickly did a 180. So anyone who believes anything they say is naive.
They don’t care about the recreational golfer. It’s all about protecting the USGA’s and R&A’s golden goose the U.S. Open and The Open. So when they say they’ll look at driver forgiveness next. It’s not with the recreational golfer in mind.
Eguller Yeah, but Rory said it will help the environment, so we go that going for us
Bravopilot Good to hear that he's offsetting the carbon footprint from his plane and exotic cars
