Super League Predictions
Spuzz His game was awful for a while.
He had, I think, a pretty bad hand injury for awhile.
I watched a little LIV again yesterday. It isn’t very interesting. Yeah they show a lot of shots, but it doesn’t flow.
I find the LIV events kind of hard to follow, they're all over the place.
On a side note, apparently Tiger can't be bought even for a reported $700-800 mil!
This came from when Norman was on FOX with Fvcker Carlson....
https://www.golfwrx.com/689692/greg-norman-reveals-tiger-turned-down-tiger-turned-down-between-700-800-million-to-join-liv-golf/
Spuzz it's all "business
Not about being a "business", it's all about poking the bear (PGA/R&A).
Without sponsorships and a tv deal....which is kind of weird because they have camera's
all over the course, seemingly on every hole....they'll NEVER see any profits.
Which they could apparently care less about, I bet some of those sheiks have rolls of t/p
made from $100 bills!
Btw where did all those camera crews and production staff come from?
- Edited
darpar I wouldn't say never as far as profit goes. Norman has already said this season is basically a characterization run and that the final format will be developed as they learn what works and what doesn't. It's a start up, so profit is generally unheard of unless you have a revolutionary new product. What they hope to do is steal enough of the PGA Tours customers to make a go at out competing the PGA Tour sponsors, or to make the PGA Tour want to make a deal. One or the other needs to fail or both will be unprofitable in the long run if they don't form a merger or non-compete agreement of some sort. The strength of LIV is that their investor might not mind taking a sustained loss for the future potential, but are Taylormade, Nike, and Callaway willing to do the same?
Taylormade has indicated maybe not since they haven't (yet) cancelled sponsorship of their LIV golfer(s).
johnnydoom I also recently saw a Srixon commercial that featured Koepka very prominently, so I guess not all companies are backing away from players who chose to go to the LIV tour.
- Edited
Not sure how big these sponsors contracts are, but if LIV doesn’t get more exposure i.e. a TV deal then I’d think they’d have to take a look and see if they’re getting the bang for their buck.
Looking at the live gate attendance and that was weak as well. And if they aren’t allowed in the Majors then paying all that money and only getting 80,000 YouTube viewers doesn’t seem like a wise investment.
I’m sure they’ll give it time, but people have short attention spans and it’s possible one day people will say Brooks who? Lol Nike and Srixon will have to take notice. Just looking at the tea leaves as they stand today. Pure conjecture on my part. Time will tell.
Koepka's sponsor contract may have an extended deadline so that these ads were placed well in advance
and it may not be worth the hassle. Who knows.
Sneakylong
Don't know where you are getting your numbers for YouTube viewing numbers but YouTube shows 621,779 views for the Sunday Final Round...Maybe not "live" views in the moment, but that's a way larger number of viewers live and/or video than the 80,000 you mention...