Jelopster
I like that look too. When considering the TS2 I've always wondered how clean you could get the cavity if you removed the badges. I don't think they are crazy obtrusive but from pics I've seen of used ones they do look to have a tendency of getting dented up.
Maltby DBM Forged irons.....OMG!!!
- Edited
sdandrea1 For example: wide sole is better for lush turf, narrow sole/ sharp leading edge better on tight lies?
IMO narrow sole and low bounce easier to get leading edge under ball with good forward shaft lean. Part of it is technique but wide sole shovels harder to make crisp contact from tight lies and non-lush turf. (I play muni golf that isn't lush and perfect + play the ball as it lies ). Those designs IMO were designed for lush watered turf that seems to be going away as time marches forward.
Louisville Classic 50's 2i sole
When I see something like that my first inclination is to reach for a dinner roll
bad9 you know, I always felt the same about Wishon irons, the performance was generally there, but not once did I set them at address and say “oh that looks great”. The 560 looked great in the bag, never could figure out what it was, but never liked it at address. I have also tried the 870, 770 and the Sterlings (really hated the sound/feel of those), they were all pretty much ugly piglets that worked pretty well, but not enough for me to ignore how much I didn’t care for the look.
I've played the MMBs and they are just as easy to hit as my TEs.
colej
Held it in my hands and it was love at first sight!
Son of a ……
TE's younger, better looking sister.