Tom Brady dead

brsmith · 2016-04-25T18:35:04+00:00

For the first 4 games. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15353950/tom-brady-new-england-patriots-four-game-suspension-deflategate-reinstated-appeals-court

Release

We all break the speed limit on the roadway at one time or the other and sometimes unintentionally and sometimes with very poor excuse, regardless.
Then why some got speeding ticket and some seldom do ?

Getting caught in the "grey area" is one thing, Lie about it and try to deny the wrong doing is totally another issue. Brady is being punished by not cooperating with the hands which feed him and tried to bite it.
In other words, got caught reckless driving is punishable by fine and maybe a light jail time with probation, but if one decided to go to the Court and fought the case with false pretension and presenting false evidence ( or erased the material evidence ), one could lose the traffic case and also punishable for lying under oath.

It's never too funny watching these public figures trying to get out of a jam with evidence arrows pointing all over their faces. "no I never inhaled", "no, I never have sex with this woman......Ms......"
"Senators, what dose it matter now ? trying to prove that I did not do my job right, let's drop the hearing and moving on to the future ...leave me alone "

Sadness is, we the people allowed this to happen over and over again.

If I were residing over the hearing of the Brady case, I would have given heavier sentence instead of upheld the original punishment. How's barred from the entire 2016 season plus monetary punishment ?

Sneakylong

Release

You obviously never read the Wells report. If you did you'd realize what a bunch of crap it is. Using your speeding analogy this was like going 70 in a 65 zone. And I wouldn't know personally having never gotten a speeding ticket in my 45 years of driving.

Ever wonder why the NFL didn't release their findings from last year regarding testing the football pressure at random games? Could it be that the Ideal Gas Law disproved their findings by the pseudoscience company they hired?

This case is full of more holes than swiss cheese. It would never and didn't stand up in court. It only stood up on appeal because of the absolute power given to Goodell in the CBA. And even that was a split decision.

Release

Sneakylong

The question is not why the team was punished, the question should be whether it should have gone to the Court in the first place.
You are so full of yourself by ignoring the facts of life. And you should not believe everything you read, if you don't know that, perhaps you should.
Observe what's happening, not just over your head but farther out. I realized there are things could not be taught if either the subject refused to learn or not capable of learning.
There should never had been a case to go to the Court, period. A waste of tax payer's money and time.
A drama created for the boring life of the average.

Kids got caught with their hands in the cookie jar crying they are not the only one whom dipped their hands in the jar thus they should not be punished. While in the meantime kicking the broken cookies under the table to hide it .

Never liked the team from the 80's , winning or losing, I could care less.

This country's moral standard had gone backward maybe that's the only way to be competitive for survival. However, it should not be the base of the excuse for what happened.

Which hole on the cheese are you looking through ? Look through from the other side.

Sneakylong

Release

The real question is had Chris Mortenson not mis-reported what he was told by an NFL person that night we'd never be where we are. Courts are where disputes are settled. This is an arbitration / labor law case.

Take the time to read Sally Jenkins article in the Washington post then you won't sound so naïve about this case.

Umfaan

Sneaky,
http://www.profootballrumors.com/2015/07/nfl-offered-reduce-tom-brady-suspension
here is one of many links to talk of possible settlement offers made. Also the judges you favor rulings also urged Brady and Goodell to settle out of court. Seems naïve of you this late in the game to claim to not have knowledge of these events. Then for you to still hold onto the Ideal Gas Law when it has been demonstrated to not be applicable in this case. Why isn't the Ideal Gas Law being used as a defense?
Here is more information about why it is important to the judges about the destruction of cell phone:
http://www.atlredline.com/no-destroying-tom-bradys-cell-phone-was-not-okay-1720689663

Also we can not know if the equipment employees obtained another set of phones to cover-up the trail of evidence. Without Brady's phone we may never khow.

Sneakylong

Umfaan

Yes Berman asked the two sides to come to an agreement. Many judges do that. No offer was ever made as far as I know by the NFL. And Brady was never going to accept a suspension. As for Jastremsk and McNally's phones. They were not personal phones, they were Patriot issued phones. So now you're suggesting a conspiracy by Kraft to switch out their phones? Ridiculous.

The Ideal Gas Law is relevant to explain the football pressure and was used as the defense in the original hearing with Goodell. You don't find it interesting that the NFL never released their findings on the Ideal Gas Law this past season? Obviously we are well beyond that now. Again read Sally Jenkins as she explains what a load of crap Goodell's case was all along. I suppose she's a huge Pats fan herself (insert eyes rolling emoji here).

You guys keep ducking the question as to why Favre only got a fine for not handing over his phone (again, precedent). And what about the Vikings tampering with footballs by heating them up on the sidelines only getting a warning? There was actual real video tape evidence against the Vikings.

Again, fairness and precedent were absent in Goodell's punishment with Brady. But this is the same idiot that initially gave Ray Rice a 4 game suspension for knocking out his wife that was caught on tape. And then this idiot judge, jury and executioner interviewed the perpetrator (Rice) and the victim (his wife) at the same time.

This was a case that was started by an ESPN reporter reporting bogus information given to him the night of the Colts game by an ex Jets exec, now an NFL exec. Once the erroneous 'cheating' train had left the station there was no slowing it down.

This was nothing more than a witch hunt that got out of control by an incompetent commissioner. Railroading the face of your league was a real 'smaht' move. Luckily for the League it's as popular as it is. Things do change however.

The concussion issue will be the downfall of the NFL. It may take awhile and probably not in my lifetime, but this is a problem not going away.

pike51

I blame Nixon.

Release

Sneakylong

Sneaky,

Not everyone will agree with all that's under the Sun, and that's the beauty of this world ( at least where I live ).
However, the information express freeways we are experiencing today does not mean we could make a better decision or understanding with the bombardment of information.
Take in the information from all corners and understand the motive of the source as we all know even numbers could be twisted to represent very different view. Make your best judgement.

Realizing most the time the right answers might not be the popular answer at the time.

I dislike the Patriots and Brady not because of what they had done ( proven or not ), I despise them because they did not own their action and treat others like they are stupid. They had lost my respect for them for this lifetime.
I could never rally for them, ever.

You seemed to like to gather information on all kind of subject, which is good, but like I told my clients - information is rampant these days, only the smart ones could see through the smoke screen.

I'll repeat again, the right decision does not need to be agreed by the majority; as proven in history, human beings were easily sweep to one side or the other, even with the assumed intelligent ones could not avoid it.

Disagreement is common and very okay. I often disagree with my best of friends and family members but that does not change our relationship and the respect for each other. Trying hard to prove a point to no end will lose every time.

Sneakylong

Release

Put me in the more informed camp. I agree some times not knowing all the details makes little difference and you can get away with being ignorant (lack of knowledge) of the facts. In this case however knowing more makes all the difference. And there is a huge amount of smoke screen (red herring / misinformation) stuff out there on this case.

Also, knowing more information about what teams have done would show you the Patriots really aren't any different than the other teams in the NFL. Except they win a lot more.

Release

Sneakylong

Read up more from the Media dose not mean you have more information, you gather more of the other's opinion.
More information sometimes might be confusing, unless you are a super computer (8th Generation ? ) to sort out and analyze the massive information out there.

Patriot is no difference than some of the other teams, why do you think the game needs multiple game balls prepared by both team for the referees to choose ? I said, it's the way they handle it after they had gotten caught, not just because they were the one whom got caught cheating.
The apparent image of arrogance was a big put off. They don't fit in the "hero", "idol" category.

When you get caught, you can't use the excuse of why me, everyone else is doing the similar thing. Whomever was handling the public relationship and their legal advisory should be canned. This dare you to prove it attitude is childish.

It's not how you handle the winning but how you handle the losing makes the difference between a true champion and the rest ( something similar by Jack Nicklaus, whom was not a gracious loser when he was young ).

The Patriots team and the staff had failed in handling the situation. If they think by denying their action and fighting it in our court system would change the public's opinion, is dead wrong.

Yes, it is just a game. it weights a ton when this issue became a public focus !

Sneakylong

Release

We'll just have to agree to disagree. Your argument reminds me of trying to talk to a low information voter. They have strong opinions based on little knowledge. You'll never convince me that less is more when it comes to forming an informed opinion. But to each their own.

Release

Sneakylong
Don't want to insult you.
You're coming acoss like someone glued to a laptop seldom losing touch of the real world.
Low informed voter ?
Sonny . I'm not even gonna try to correct you.

Martee

Well the Brady Legal team now has Ted Olson on it. Let the appeals go forward.

I have a feeling it is going to stop here, no way the SC takes the case on unless it
gets reframed. JMO.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/bradys-legal-team-adds-former-solicitor-general/ar-BBst1yk?li=BBnb7Kz

Sneakylong

Martee

Good hire by the Brady legal team. There's also one long shot. Trump loves Brady (he's a winner) and if Trump wins in November (something I strongly hope doesn't happen) he would appoint a judge who would side with Brady. (insert tongue in cheek emoji here)

http://www.washingtonian.com/2016/04/29/tom-brady-hires-ted-olson-supreme-court-deflategate-fight/

Release

"Patriots owner Robert Kraft did not appeal the team's $1 million fine and the loss of a first-round pick in the 2016 draft and a fourth-rounder in 2017 as part of the penalties."

What does this message indicate ? Someone wish to maintain his membership ? Or just moving on ?

brsmith

Release

To me it indicates a fight that is not worth the cost or repercussions of fighting it.

Robert Kraft, or any NFL owner knows when there is no real upside. What's done is done.

Sneakylong

Release

The more likely scenario was Kraft thought by accepting the fine and draft picks Goodell would go easy on Brady. His assumption was wrong as we now know, and he then strongly regretted that decision in a harshly worded response towards Goodell. Once again you're lack of knowledge in this case is glaring.

Release

brsmith

Obviously Brady is either too dumb or believing he has something to gain by taking this further.
Or maybe he believed he had the short end of the rope by following the instruction given to him from the team management.

brsmith

Release

To me, for whatever reason he destroyed his cellphone, there will ALWAYS be doubt in his role in this. To me, it's over, I will always give Brady the credit of being one of the top NFL QB's, but I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

Release

brsmith

Yes, agreed.
The smoking gun will always be there even after he retired from Pro Football. For sure, Others will watch a documentary film on this drama in the future .

Why we have no real man these days whom will admit their fault in public ? Even the Saints have weakness !

Ringoblack

brsmith

Not to start this up again, but if Brady is the quality QB player everyone says he is, I find it difficult to accept that he could not tell a difference when the ball was in his hands. It is often said that very good golfers (like TW and PM, etc.) can tell a one-half swing weight difference in a club. If that is so, and I think it is, why can't a very good QB, who throws a football for a living, not notice less air in the ball?

Release

Ringoblack

That was not the point. I dare him to face his maker if he truly had nothing to do with the intent to cheat.

Like I told a group of sandbaggers once, if the trophy is so important to them that they cheat to have a better chance of bringing one home, then go buy one to put on the fireplace mantel. Because the cheaters know whom cheated.

Sneakylong

Ringoblack

This is an argument you often hear. Guess who else should've 'felt' the difference in air pressure? How about the guys with stripes that touch the ball the most and are responsible for enforcing the rules? They noticed nothing, zip, nada.

brsmith

" why can't a very good QB, who throws a football for a living, not notice less air in the ball?"

He can, but probably wouldn't be complaining, unless he didn't want it that way.

Release

brsmith but probably wouldn't be complaining

Then he is an accomplice, regardless.

He probably didn't mind lying under oath anyway.

« Previous Page Next Page »