ZWExton
Satisfying enough when there's a rather significant discrepancy in major wins. If there was only a 1 win-difference or a tie - I'd be more open to the debate.
But not when there are 5 major wins needed to eclipse the record.
That's fairly significant.
And, for all intents and purposes, unrealistic.
Celebrate him for being a great, great player from '97-2009, perhaps the greatest during that 12-year era. Just don't call him the greatest of all time, because based on major championships - he ain't. No excuses needed. You either have 18 or 19 majors and are part of the conversation or your don't.
Not
that
complicated.