Does Tiger make the cut at the Honda this week?
In good position!
There is always so much negativity when Tiger's game comes up in forums. He is clearly the greatest player of all time. Nicklaus never had his game or quality of competition on tour. Sure, he has had his personal problems but why judge him on his game. This is the first time he has been pain free in 5 years. He is good for the game as he brings the fans and excitement to a sport that really needs it. Ticket sales and TV ratings go up at least 40% when he plays. I love to watch him as a golf fan and hope he does well.
Put Tiger's major championships in a box, then put Jack's major championships in a box.
Then tell me who has more.
It's that easy.
- Edited
Satisfying enough when there's a rather significant discrepancy in major wins. If there was only a 1 win-difference or a tie - I'd be more open to the debate.
But not when there are 5 major wins needed to eclipse the record.
That's fairly significant.
And, for all intents and purposes, unrealistic.
Celebrate him for being a great, great player from '97-2009, perhaps the greatest during that 12-year era. Just don't call him the greatest of all time, because based on major championships - he ain't. No excuses needed. You either have 18 or 19 majors and are part of the conversation or your don't.
Not
that
complicated.
- Edited
Jack has a better major record....I don't particularly care about all the seconds, although it is interesting side conversation, which could go either way. Jack had more front runners to deal with, but after that, not much by way of depth of talent. Part of the reason Tiger did not have as many front runners is because he made it that way. Tiger is more Jordan like in his competitive nature, like a stone cold assassin. He wanted to destroy the competition. Tiger completely revolutionized the game to where it is today, good bad or in-between, the guys kicking ass right now watched TW growing up. In that regard Tiger has had much more of an actual impact on the game!
Would have loved to see Tiger v Jack mono y mono.
- Edited
Nicklaus shot a 30 on the back-nine at Augusta on Sunday back in '86, at 46 years of age, to win his 18th major.
And we're seriously having this discussion about a 14x major winner who was greater? Who couldn't lay off the competitive juice and ended up sacrificing his health and career due to injury?
Seriously?
What part of Dr. Anthony Galea do people prefer to not consider?
And he's still FIVE majors short of eclipsing Jack's record????!!!! LOL
Cut line presently at +4 .
Tiger should easily get into the weekend if it stays there.
PA-PLAYA yes, why not, wax poetic all you want about Jack, but Tiger is the only one we could have this conversation about. I still consider Jack's record better, but TW is right there. And the rest is just conjecture re Galea, etc. I hate the moral discussions about athletes, we have no idea who they really are. I'm sure Jack is a swell guy, but that doesn't give him extra points to being a better golfer. I think there are enough points to be made.about Tiger to say he was a better golfer than Jack, but Major record is not one of them. Tiger would need to win several times more, including a major for me to say he's better than Jack and yes I'm saying he does.not need to eclipse.Jacks major record.to be considered better
LeBron will not be considered greater than MJ until he either ties or bests Jordan’s record. It’s that simple.
Some will want to compare competitive eras, which is fine. I’ve got plenty of examples, between Trevino, Watson, Weiskopf and Palmer, to make an argument.
Who did Tiger have to overcome? Vijay Singh? Phil Mickelson? Who else? Please don’t tell me Rory Sabatini stood in Tiger’s way. Don’t try to validate Y.E. Yang’s victory back in 2009.
Compare who Jack finished 2nd to compared to who Tiger finished 2nd to.
Then get back to me.