sdandrea1 No way! How could you possibly do that without aligning the shafts?
Spinning, Flo'ing and adjustable drivers
- Edited
Par4QC Have you ever considered what it is that makes those Eye2 irons play so nice? Not just for you, but for everyone that makes the statement of such? You ever try the ZZ lite shafts in other(non PING) heads?
They perform well because of the synergy resulting from the shaft characteristics coupled with the head design. You still can hit lousy shots with them. Are you saying that ZZ Lite shafts are Flo'd/aligned? Is that even possible with a steel shaft?
sdandrea1 yeah, but did you align the shaft in your putter?
Rickochet I know what theories you believe in. Just as I do with "flat earthers" I dismiss your theories because of the level of hogwash.
Par4QC Negative, ghost rider. If you're playing by the rules and holing out, then you hit 18 shots per round. No more, no less.
puttnfool I'll admit my lack of knowledge here in the adjustable driver realm. When you adjust the loft/face angle, does the logo on the shaft change orientation?
I don't participate much anymore, but I can't help myself. You don't know the answer to that question but you feel you know enough to declare spine aligning as snake oil?
puttnfool If you're playing by the rules and holing out, then you hit 18 shots per round. No more, no less.
puttnfool Bottom line is, we all miss all but 18 times each round.
You cannot even comprehend your own statements!! You can damn well miss every shot, every round. As well as I can go for every damn 551 yd. hole, every time, every round!
You now know nothing about clubmaking, as well as nothing about the game of chess.(btw, you cannot move into checkmate, so you will need to delete your answer in that other thread, or retire the king)
kchacker well, when the guy that wrote a 5 (was it 5?) page article about it says he doesn't align his, I think I'm close to the truth. If you read that article, it's obvious that no one really knows what's going on. All they do is theorize and hope they're right.
The take a club they can't hit, spin it around until it vibrates like they like, then put it together. They go back out with it and hit it better because they think it's better and they believe they're on to something.
Simple fact is, I bet any of the top 10 golfers in the world could take my clubs and shoot even par with them. They're probably a solid 2 flexes too soft for them, none are "aligned", and the grip size is probably bigger than they like. Quite simply, the most important part of where the ball goes when you hit it is NOT whether the shaft is "aligned". The most important variable is the swing. As has been said before, practice more and you will score much lower than if you spend that time spinning your shafts around to some arbitrarily determined point.
Where the hell is John Fisher to straighten this guy out properly???
- Edited
puttnfool Simple fact is, I bet any of the top 10 golfers in the world could take my clubs and shoot even par with them. They're probably a solid 2 flexes too soft for them, none are "aligned", and the grip size is probably bigger than they like. Quite simply, the most important part of where the ball goes when you hit it is NOT whether the shaft is "aligned". The most important variable is the swing. As has been said before, practice more and you will score much lower than if you spend that time spinning your shafts around to some arbitrarily determined point.
This makes a lot of sense to me, however, I have made the same argument about club fitting religion. Given enough talent and practice we could all probably shoot our best with misaligned and poorly fit clubs on a good day. That being said, there is no good reason NOT to get fit (if you have the $) or NOT scientifically build our clubs to the most consistent tolerances we can, given that building skill and the right building equipment. I just think the golf talent is more critical than the fitting/aligning.
Par4QC you're a lost cause, too, aren't ya...