- Edited
I mostly agree. Nick Price did the best he could with the players he had. They were simply outmatched in just about every category. But I wouldn't blame him for wanting nothing to do with this going forward. It has been a humbling experience for him, I'm sure.
And I also agree that the Golf Channel blowhards are putting the cart before the horse as it relates to Ryder Cup competition. We've won only 2 events going back to the 1995 Ryder Cup at Oak Hill, despite always having the strongest team statistically. Although, I must say, the Europeans are going through somewhat of a cyclic drought at the moment with very few proven players within their ranks.
I do think the future Ryder Cup events look promising for the US in the next few years, as the talented younger American players seem to have overcome the usual Ryder Cup precedence of experience over talent. I think this bodes well for the American team, as these younger American players seem to mesh well together... in a similar aspect as to those Europeans from recent years.
That said, anyone who has followed the Ryder Cup history over the past two decades understands that it's much more than talent. We have predominantly fielded the stronger teams (as individual players) over the past 20 years and we only have 2 successful Ryder Cup victories as a result.
It reminds us that it's not just about talent, but an attitude of an underdog that feels they have nothing to lose, and they tend to play like it, not as individuals - but as a team.