- Edited
Agreed.
I've questioned Rory's commitment level for years, and although he can still win the occasional tournament against the Kevin Chappell's, Ryan Moore's and Gary Woodland's of the tour - his C game ain't gonna carry him in the more significant events.
A lot of times it just doesn't seem like he's hungry. The generational money given to him via Nike hasn't helped.
And money in general hasn't helped the product. I read an article yesterday about how Matt Kuchar has finally "accepted" his shortcomings in the British Open and is in the process of moving past it.
You know what? Lee Trevino, Jack Nicklaus, Tom Weiskopf, Tom Watson, etc. didn't have time to dwell on disappointments, because they were too preoccupied trying to simply earn a living.
We're definitely at a different time in pro golf, and there's a huge part of me that thinks the product back in the day was a lot more interesting than it is today. Those guys in the 60's and 70's, early part of the 80's were simply more hungry and needed to win. Player's today? They don't need to win.
Hell, look at Charles Howell III.... hasn't won in like a decade? Yet has won nearly $34 million in the past 17 years. Good player, solid player, likable personality. Just not worried so much about winning versus earning a comfortable living.
Had he been born 30 years earlier - he'd probably retired as an insurance salesman or a desk job somewhere.
Not trying to be critical, but just pointing out what I see. Give a young guy $300 million in sponsorship money - don't expect that to motivate him to work harder on his game.