When someone released a useable CB one vs the Blade one that I used to take pelts with regularly.

I think it made me say I needed to try one and have been using the Cleveland CBX2 since they modified the sole grinds on the various lofts. Haven't felt the need to try the Zipcores.

I've been golfing 27 years and I think I'm on my 4th set of wedges. I could change most clubs constantly but not a wedge. My LW is looking pretty beat up but Cally discontinued the wide sole low bounce 60 so it's staying put.

pellmell Not that I don’t believe a magazine that makes their money off of doing “positive” tests for buying new equipment… but…
I also sell equipment but not in the same vein. I tell the truth. If I remember, I’ll do the test again on the GCQuad and post the numbers. Again, I sell equipment and I’m telling you there was not discernible difference.

      Typhoon Plus, who did they get for testing? Any club test should be from a 15 'cap player.(s) And if a 15 'cap can hit wedges to perform as they should, repeatedly, or well enough that tests show new grooves to be much better than old, then that is the reason they are at 15 still......it's the only club they can hit properly. Otherwise, bullshit with any club tests.
      jmo. imo. TIFWIW.

        Par4QC I made one like this back in the late 1980's. It was called Mr. Smooth.

        You saw no difference in play off fairway, rough or sand, but holy cripe if is was wet or raining. An 8 foot high knuckle ball

          I think it would be cool to wear out some clubs. I’ve never done that, not even close.