About that Ryder Cup....
Rory says that if the Ryder Cup can't be played with fans in attendance, it should be postponed another year. He makes a compelling argument. Would the Super Bowl be the same without NFL fans? It would definitely be different. But given our inability to look that far ahead into the future with what we're dealing with currently, I'm guessing the option of not allowing fans has to at least weigh on the minds of all pro sports commissioners at the moment.
Then again, if health authorities deem it unsafe for fans to be in attendance, how many pro athletes are gonna feel comfortable traveling to various cities (or countries in the case of the Ryder Cup)?
“That’s from a European, going to America, knowing that I’m going to get abuse," McIlroy said. "Obviously it would be better for Europeans to play without fans because we wouldn’t deal with some of the stuff that you have to put up with, but at the same time, it wouldn’t be a great spectacle. There would be no atmosphere. So if it came to whether they had to choose between not playing the Ryder Cup of playing it without fans, I would say just delay it a year.”
I'm no LeBron apologist for sure, but several weeks ago he got roasted for suggesting the same thing, maintaining that he wouldn't resume playing hoops in empty arenas.
https://www.golfchannel.com/news/rory-mcilroy-fan-less-ryder-cup-not-ryder-cup