bad9 you know, I always felt the same about Wishon irons, the performance was generally there, but not once did I set them at address and say “oh that looks great”. The 560 looked great in the bag, never could figure out what it was, but never liked it at address. I have also tried the 870, 770 and the Sterlings (really hated the sound/feel of those), they were all pretty much ugly piglets that worked pretty well, but not enough for me to ignore how much I didn’t care for the look.

      DC300 They are different in the web of the hosel. Maybe to provide strength because of the weight port inside.

        scotts33 I can do without the wide sole and bounce but I need the low COG, killed leading edge, and longer blade length. Some clubs have a sole that looks wide but plays narrower because the rear part is off the ground. Cally RAZR X were a great example. Good low COG but doesn’t play wide.

          4 months later

          DC300 The 560 looked great in the bag, never could figure out what it was, but never liked it at address.

          Irons are funny that way. I don't like my G425 irons in-the-bag look, but at address, they are hit-a-licious. Maltby TE Forged and GigaGolf Forged, same deal.