Nobody watches on tv because most are at work Monday morning. Most event volunteers can’t stay there an additional day. Most attendees aren’t willing to spend the extra money on hotels and flight changes to show up at the venue and watch for an additional day.

Playoffs have happened 33 times going all the way back to 1895.

Do the math. This is golf’s Haley’s Comet. Doesn’t happen very often.

People haven’t been interested in Monday playoffs in the past, they’re not gonna be interested in Monday playoffs in the future.

Long past due that they got with the times imo.

    PA-PLAYA There were a lot of people interested when an injured Tiger and the journeyman DiMarco duked it out at Torrey Pines.

        Tinker

        US Open is a tricked up dog and pony show so the USGA can try and humiliate players and chest thump. Its the Worst of the 4 majors. Chambers Bay was a disaster.
        There is no "ultimate challenge" in forcing the field to hit irons of tees, Putt greens on which balls don't stop and where luck is as important, if not moreso to skill.

        Traditions ? Its called evolution.

          Choosing the proper club and making the proper shot is golf. Chambers Bay was picked for it’s regional location, not it’s playability. Marion is a shorter course and it provided a great test. Design creates the challenge, not length.

            Tinker

            You choose the proper club ( hopefully) for the shot in every tournament. Its not unique to the US Open. If you want to talk about chalkenging every shot , every ball flight , playing the ball in the air and on the ground the true Open Championship is in every way and infinitely a better test of a golf. British Open is undenibly the ultimate test of a golfer.

            Not sure why you are bringing length into the discussion? US opens are often the longest course set ups of all the majors.

            Back on topic. The 18 hole playoff was stupid. It cost them money, the course lost a day, everybody had to stick around an extra day. This often impacted the next week's tournament .Tv viewership was next to zero and it was unexciting. There was no reason to keep it.

              I think the USGA has gotten away from what made their major championship great. It's all about countering distance now, and not by narrowing fairways and pinching doglegs and growing rough, but making holes dramatically longer to counter the longest hitters.

              It has significantly reduced the art of shotmaking.

              Outside of Bubba Watson, I don't know of a long-hitting player today who has the remote ability to carve the ball on-command like he can. Unfortunately for Bubba - putting is also part of the equation and hasn't exactly been his strongest suit.

              The test required years ago in this major has changed dramatically during the bomb-and-gouge era. It's not the same tournament anymore.

                PA-PLAYA

                They are at or nearing a tipping point.

                A dialed down, tour only ball is needed.

                  That’s what I was referring to. Buying the gas station on the corner and using it to put in a new tee is not the answer. My other favorite tournament is the British Open. The British depend on the elements to create the challenge. Played around Father’s Day the US Open can’t count on weather to help. They took the teeth out of Pinehurst when they got rid of the rough. Now they’re picking links style layouts bot without the weather conditions it becomes bomb and gouge golf. Trees, water, high rough, doglegs, deep traps, you got yourself an open.

                  They had the right ball, wound balata. The manufacturers wanted to make cheaper balls and sell them for high dollar.

                    Tinker

                    Producing products for less to maximize profit is true for every manufactured product on the planet, not exclusive to golf balls.

                      I’m sure metal baseball bats are more economical to make and use than wood and hit the ball farther but thank God MLB didn’t allow it to change their game.

                        Tinker

                        That would likely be based on safety and logistics . Aluminum bats create higher exit ball speeds which would be dangerous , especially for pitchers.
                        The ball travels further off An aluminum bat which would change the game.

                        From a fan enjoyment perspective, maybe it would add excitement , more gappers, more home runs , who knows?

                        All it might take is 1 splintered bat impaling and killing an MLB player for aluminum bats to be a discussion point in MLB. They would need to change the ball though......sound familiar ?

                            Weirfan
                            There’s already been a player impaled with a splintered bat (Steve Yeager), but he wasn’t killed.
                            That was in the 70’s when this was considered an accident and not a reason to ban wooden bats. Also the decade when Rick Monday was hailed as being a hero for stopping the burning of the American flag during a game. Today he’d probably be vilified for impeding on someone’s ‘rights’.