professor
Noted. But that doesn't mean that people who take note of well-documented tendencies and patterns aren't at liberty to express their opinions and attempt to connect dots and develop their own thoughts.
It is assumed that Tiger gets a lopsided amount of scrutiny that others don't. It still doesn't mean that his pattern of behavior over the years, which has been confirmed by reliable, credible sources (the two most sensational ones being confirmed by Tiger himself!) warrants a non-opinion on the matter.
To suggest otherwise, ultimately, in the manner you have expressed time and time again, puts you in the nefarious situation of judging others, who do express opinions, in the same light in which you claim others have judged him.
Not everyone takes "glee" in the plight of others. And to assume that is beneath you, of all people. Some of us actually sense a troubled person struggling to come to grips with the reality of his past and his future, and for those of us who appreciate his enormous contributions to the sport (regardless of how we personally perceive his known history of narcissistic behavior) would rather see him go out as a respected figure in the game versus witnessing a very tragic cautionary tale unfolding.
You either get that or you don't. And to continue assuming that everything being reported about him is false, misleading, and agenda-driven says just as much about you as it does those who you take issue with.
