Sneakylong You see I don't expect science to have all the answers. But they'll have more answers that you do.
You're right, science will always be limited to some degree which is why you disagree with me at times. My ideas, thoughts and actions are based on the science which I understand has limitations but something you refuse to accept if the limitations lead to a different thought or idea than you have. Unfortunately, you cannot see this simple fact and choose to interact the way you do. I just laugh because all you are really doing is arguing with yourself, you just don't see it. One more thing, I have never called you stupid, yet you respond like I have. All I said was be cautious because as you may not want to admit, science does not have all the answers and therefore we can't know how safe and effective anything is until after the fact - the truth will always reveal itself. My caution is because the science can't tell us everything, but you'll label me anti-science for being cautious right? Then, over time, when the science shows my caution was warranted, you revert to the fact that the science is limited and doesn't know everything.
I'll keep it simple for you - every time you acknowledge the fact that the science can change or doesn't know everything at any given moment in time, you are in essence supporting everything I say. So you can argue, criticize and insult me all you want, because you are really just doing it to yourself and you don't even know it - this is the funny part to me.