Spuzz - CVTs in general really suck, and Nissan's CVTs are probably the worst of the bunch. I owned a 2009 Nissan Murano (the first year that it had a CVT, if memory serves me correctly), and I hated it so much that I traded it in less than a year .... and I usually keep my cars for at least 5 years or close to 100,000 miles (two of my Subarus were more like 135,000 to 145,000 miles, and I had a Volvo that I kept for 177,000 miles, and I didn't purchase it new).
We have two cars - The 2017 Volvo V60 T6 with Polestar upgrades, and my wife's 2018 VW Alltrack wagon with a 6-speed manual transmission (she refuses to own/drive a car with an automatic transmission, and had 5 Subarus prior to the VW). I also owned 3 Subaru Outbacks (two 4-cylinder models and one with the long since discontinued 3.0 litre 6-cylinder). The only reasons that my wife didn't purchase another Subaru were:
1.) They have downsized the base 4-cylinder engine, and that reduced the power from 174 BHP to 142 BHP (torque is also down by more than 25 lb-ft).
2.) Subaru quality seems to have gone down considerably in recent years, at least based on the two most recent Imprezas that my wife owned (a 2007 and a 2011 model).
I really liked my Outback wagons, and was considering getting a new one last year, but their 4-cylinder engine is SEVERLY underpowered when it is in the Outback and the 6-cylinder engine is only offered in the loaded "premium" models, which can easily top $40K. Although Volvos have had a spotty quality and reliability history in recent years, I couldn't resist the 300+ HP and 320+ lb-ft of torque in the V60 wagon that I got ... and AWD plus loads of safety features at a discounted price below $40K made my decision rather easy! Besides, Subaru's automatic transmission is actually a CVT and although it has gotten good reviews, my prior experience with CVTs tells me to stay away from any vehicle that has one of those transmissions.