COSTCO K-Sig - Titleist suing!
HybridWood No thanks. I am playing with my last one now. Then its on to Bionic. The Greptiles were great.
ode the new ksig is no longer the same ball, ala 338 dimples vs. 360 and 3 pc vs. 4 pc....
Kind of makes a person wonder why, if a company did not violate copyrights, etc., would they change the ball that had a lot of support. It is a completely different ball.
And, I'm sure I'm playing some $.50 ball that is as good or better than what this will be.
Par4QC Kind of makes a person wonder why, if a company did not violate copyrights, etc., would they change the ball that had a lot of support. It is a completely different ball.
Just speculation but if Costco does not own the patent, how can they be sued for patent infringement? It's quite possible they can't obtain any further stock of the ball now being litigated so they found something else to slap their K Sig logo on.
mikeintopeka Just speculation but if Costco does not own the patent, how can they be sued for patent infringement?
I thought patent infringement meant "building and/or selling something identical to a patent held by someone else ". ??
Meh.
I'm waiting for Sam's Club to rip off the Callaway Chrome-soft.
sdandrea1 It does not have to look like, or be identical to, the item infringed upon. A golf ball cannot be patented, as such. Only the process to make it what it is.
One cannot build and sell a hydraulic shaft puller, for example. It is patented. You may build/sell any puller though, as long as it does not use hydraulics.
Patent infringement is the commission of a prohibited act with respect to a patented invention without permission from the patent holder. Permission may typically be granted in the form of a license. The definition of patent infringement may vary by jurisdiction, but it typically includes using or selling the patented invention.