sdandrea1 Eguller At least you can take them apart without a torch. I do like the modular/mechanical concept. I'm trying to imagine how they'd use a graphite shaft, tho. Epoxy a threaded insert in the shaft tip?
sdandrea1 rsvman2 I don't care about their looks but who will want them??? Fixed it...... except for @Walterjn 😉😉
Typhoon rsvman2 $349 per CLUB?!?!? I don't care about their looks but who can afford them??? Does the owner of the company sound like an idiot when he talks? Oh wait, that’s PXG… same pricing in the beginning.
ode Can't be unseen! Weren't these a thing several years ago🤔. Surprised they have not crashed and burned by now!
pellmell Reminds me of the god-awful Cleveland VAS 792, which have the worst playability of any iron produced in the past 100 years.
DonM pellmell Because of the unique design, the MPF measurements were not applicable. It still may have been unforgiving, I don't know. But the measurements assume a hosel at the normal location.
sdandrea1 pellmell I think using .5902768 would be more accurate than .5092. Other than that, he's pretty close. 🙄
DonM pellmell The measurement that hurt it was the C dimension, because of the inboard hosel. The vertical COG was high, too, but some modern Pings are about as high. The MOI was pretty good. The C Dim was what really killed it in the rating.
