backinit They can't be too worried about it...the elite have been buying the property on Martha's Vineyard.

It's truly a shame that you and others here don't believe you're a part of we. Congrats! Enjoy your next round of golf! So little humility and gratitude here... Do realize, if there was an objective view of you and yours from someone in the majority of the rest of the world, they'd consider you to be "elite". But your suggestion that "they" (I guess you mean liberals, or democrats) are comprised of a huge proportion of the wealthy? Again, another individual here who don't understand demographics nor facts. Wish I could laugh about it...

      professor
      Remember the glaciers? Have you seen the Grand Canyon? Have you seen the Rocky Mountains? What caused those, the nasty climate deniers? What would you and your ilk have done, lined up and tried to hold back the glaciers? Jumped up and done on the humps when the Rockies were forming? Dammed up the Colorado River so that the canyon couldn't have formed? Were all changes on earth caused by the use of fossil fuels. I know, it was those nasty Republicans. All the money in the world won't stop climate change (used to be global cooling, then global warming) beings they didn't know what was happening they went with climate change. YES or No?

        professor But your suggestion that "they" (I guess you mean liberals, or democrats) are comprised of a huge proportion of the wealthy?

        THEY ARE:

        Some recent US figures on the distribution of income by party: 65 percent of taxpayer households that earn more than $500,000 per year are now in Democratic districts; 74 percent of the households in Republican districts earn less than $100,00 per year. Add to this what we knew already, namely that the 10 richest congressional districts in the country all have Democratic representatives in Congress. The above numbers incidentally come from the Internal Revenue Service, via Bloomberg, and are likely to be more reliable than if they came from Project Veritas via theblaze.com.

            jsippy73 Some recent US figures on the distribution of income by party: 65 percent of taxpayer households that earn more than $500,000 per year are now in Democratic districts; 74 percent of the households in Republican districts earn less than $100,00 per year.

            Yeah? Now cross-reference that information with average or, income distribution by educational attainment. Then you might be looking at the rest of the story.
            PS You did pretty well with your post. See, disinformation is different from misinformation. Your post is of the latter type. Nice try!

              jsippy73 Does that mean they are smarter? Asking for a friend.

              No, it means they invested more in themselves for the purpose of educational and economic attainment. So you can inform your friend now. LOL

                  propman please ask your friend to decide for him/herself. Curiosity can be a good thing .

                  He is his "friend". But be careful: "Curiouslity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.)

                      professor I never said that they weren't. However, where is all the water going is the ocean hasn't risen as much as we've been told?
                      If the melting ice caps are redistributing weight, wouldn't that weight distribution be even across the whole planet?
                      Just how much weight was redistributed? A fraction of a percentage of the weight of the whole planet? Just how much slower has time been running?

                          professor No, it means they invested more in themselves for the purpose of educational and economic attainment.

                          You know nothing about me.

                              Walterjn If the melting ice caps are redistributing weight, wouldn't that weight distribution be even across the whole planet?

                              Well, the ones at the North Pole would flow south, so Canada would be flooded, unless they have a lot of canyons. If so, there will be even more adventures for folks like Equller that love fishing. Prolly be warmer also with not having all that ice creating cold air blowing down.
                              Then we have the South Pole matter. It would just fall off into space, due to the positioning of it....at the bottom.

                              So, and mind you I'm no expert, but I think the answer to your question would have to be no. There will be a lot less weight at the bottom. BUT...if the weight at the top is equal to what ran off, and flows evenly across, then it would be yes.
                              But I'm just guessing, admittedly so.

                                  I've thought for a long time: How do we know if possibly the temperature at the surface of the sun may be getting hotter? Maybe send up some of the climate alarmist up to the surface of the sun once a year and get a reading, then they can make one of their graphs of the change over time? We will then know if we can rule that out.

                                  Where will Putin send his enemies when the ice melts?
                                  (the ones that live)

                                  Yipsy didn't "man with big brain" chastise the state of CA for not picking up the fallen branches etc... wonder why that brilliant idea wasn't enacted.

                                    Just repeating an idea. Ramble on.