Super League Predictions
- Edited
garyt1957 You may not like what these guys are doing but it's not illegal
I don’t care at all - they can do want they want. Just accept the consequences of their decisions.
Based on the R & A telling the ungreat white shark to go away, all, but especially major qualifying will likely change. Their house, their rules.
I agree. Open should mean open. And I'm sure a few sponsors will try to give exemptions here and there -- should be interesting.
garyt1957 it will mostly be a mute point moving forward as in IMO the LIV players level of play will suffer, in addition they will naturally no longer qualify at some point (less the major winners), even if the courts allow them to play. As I stated when this (LIV) first became a thing , these guys have essentially given up on their competitive careers and Tiger nailed it in his presser!
- Edited
Brandel Chamblee made a good point yesterday. In other sports the player is paid before he plays. In his example Tom Brady gets paid millions of dollars and if he doesn’t perform for the team he gets benched.
In the LIV model the player gets paid before he plays and there are no consequences for playing bad. Mickelson gets $200 million up front and finishes 20 over par in his first two LIV Tournaments. He’s already got his money. On to the next event to stink it up.
Other Sports - Consequences for not playing well.
LIV - Paid to just show up. Everyone gets a trophy regardless.
Plus this was interesting. Dustin Johnson got $175 million. The entire purse for the DP World Tour this year is $155 million.
As far as the Majors go. The PGA Tour has nothing to do with any of them. They can do what they want. If they think the LIV model is bad for the game then I can see them not allowing LIV players to play.
But again, if LIV doesn’t change its model to 72 holes they can’t get world ranking points, therefore won’t qualify, so it’s a moot point. Plus there’s other criteria. One being changes to how many points are given (strength of field etc.). But the powers that be seem to be autonomous and can do what they wish.
- Edited
Not so sure the 54 hole is an issue other than the number of points to be awarded (several develomental tours are 54 holes and the get points, pga tournaments that are reduced to 54 holes still get the full point allotment).
The issue maybe the number of players teeing it up, less than 75.
Interesting the LIV has gone in partnership with the Asian Tour (read that to be a boat load of money donated) and they are sponsoring the LIV.
Not sure Chamblee is a good source, after all he was saying the LIV tournament winnings was deducted from the signing bonuses/contracts. But as I understand the contracts are across a number of years, Phil 200m across 4 years. Possible there is a clause that allows them to play less and get less or the structure can be based on performance, appearance, etc. Haven't heard anyone address the contracts that have actually saw them
Eguller Many times it does. But, look at the qualifying criteria for the US Open for example. Full criteria is llsted
on the USGA website. It is more limited than most think. Monikers can be misleading.
Sure, but those rules are already in place. You're talking about new rules specifically to hurt LIV golfers and that's just plain wrong. For all the morals being thrown around here, I don't see how that's not obvious. Again, they're not doing anything illegal.
And I'm not a LIV fan. I can't imagine ever watching a tournament. I really only watch the Majors and then usually just the last round. I'd prefer LIV didn't exist, but now that it does I don't see trying to keep them out of majors as fair or moral.
- Edited
Sneakylong Brandel Chamblee made a good point yesterday. In other sports the player is paid before he plays. In his example Tom Brady gets paid millions of dollars and if he doesn’t perform for the team he gets benched.
Actually it's not that great a point. Brady might get benched but he still gets paid his monstrous contract. Lots of guys in pro sports underperform but keep starting because of their massive contracts. The Liv guys won't get benched but if they underperform, who's to say they will get resigned? We don't know how long DJ and these other guys signed for. Was it lifetime? 5 years? 10?
Sneakylong Brandel Chamblee made a good point yesterday. In other sports the player is paid before he plays. In his example Tom Brady gets paid millions of dollars and if he doesn’t perform for the team he gets benched.
bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Yet another apples to oranges comparison AND you quoted Chambleep.
LOL
I could see Reed going through with qualifying if it ever came to it, but not DJ. Agreed re the "Opens", if they've qualified they should get in.
I think the R&A a d USGA will have a harder time doing it (ban). Not sure about the PGA . The Masters...it will be interesting to see what they do!
garyt1957 I don't know if you've watched any of the events the LIV players have been in (non LIV events)...but my small sample size wise that there seems to be very little showing of LIV players, but maybe I'm reading into it 
. With there being so much coverage of The Open, it should be clear if that's the case!
ode I don't know if you've watched any of the events the LIV players have been in (non LIV events)...but my small sample size wise that there seems to be very little showing of LIV players, but maybe I'm reading into it
Well, other than Dj and Reed how many really top notch players did the LIV get? None of them were at the top of their game before jumping. Plus I'm sure all the controversy is distracting. I could be wrong but most of these guys are pretty competitive I doubt they'll just quit trying. But there's plenty of guys in other sports who signed big multi year deals and just cruised through those years
garyt1957 I doubt they'll just quit trying
Like every other main sport, the stars don't always get paid for how they are performing at present.
Most of them get paid for what they have done in the past and are "worth" now. Some get paid on potential right off, but those cases are not frequent.
LIV is the answer to that equation, for them. If they are pros, they will continue to put in their best efforts to perform.
It's up to the GM's to figure out which ones will start coasting, or are coasting, and cut them. Since we don't know what exactly the LIV contracts entail, it's all speculation and most of it drummed up by PGA shills to demonize the LIV players.
Tiger's presser was no different than all the rest. Just baseless and clueless speculation for the sole purpose of trying to put down the competition and keep the monopoly going.
The Tour guarantees nothing, other than if you qualify and PAY the entry fees, you get a spot and two rounds to try and qualify for two more rounds and a paycheque. They actually do not guarantee the competition in those events.
(Special events excluded of course, where the peons are told to stay home)
Derogatory statements aimed at guys who have sacrificed and built the Tours up over 20 years, who now want to get (over) paid for their services reek of jealousy, bitterness, underappreciation and thanklessness (among others) of those that came before them.
