Par4QC (shaking my head)
When selling, you must portray your product in the best light possible. Even if you have to compare apples to potatoes, or oranges, I guess.
Even us dummies knew the results, before the shown 'testing'.
As usual I have no idea what you're talking about. 😕 I had no interest in the club so I didn't watch either video before posting them. Just thought they'd be interesting for those who have an interest.
After watching them Michael Newton's test with the M6 in the shorter Mini Driver shaft was interesting. Not much difference in performance distance wise. And Andy used 3 different handicap golfers testing the club with each giving their opinions along with their numbers comparing their own driver and 3 wood.
Since I don't have ESP I had no idea what each video would show performance wise until I watched them. If you're insinuating that both videos numbers were rigged in advance to show the club in a good light that's simply speculation on your part.
I'm not buying it, but then again I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist believer. I have both these guys in my favorites along with several others and I think they give honest reviews along with the data. But you can believe what you want.
The fact is all the OEM's make pretty good equipment these days so it comes down to personal preference, so I'd be surprised if a reviewer gave a product a negative review. In the end the data is the data and as they say numbers don't lie.